Programming For Fat Loss
Whilst much is made of the ultimate requirement to consume fewer calories than you expend in regards to weight loss, how you train will determine in large part, where that weight comes from. The right training will help you retain muscle and burn fat, whereas the wrong training could actually cause you to burn valuable muscle and reduce your metabolism.
When programming for fat loss, the following are the main criteria for ensuring optimal results:
So how do you achieve all of the above and are any of them mutually exclusive?
The important thing to do here is distinguish between rest and recovery. Rest means inactivity, recovery does not. Whilst recovery can involve inactivity, when it comes to fat loss, active recovery is king. This may vary in nature from one person to another, i.e. walking around to step-ups to skipping. Regardless of the client, if the goal is fat-loss, then rest periods should almost never be any longer than 60 seconds (occasionally there are physiological or psychological reasons that warrant longer rest periods).
If strength isn’t pursued at best or maintained at worst, the body can cannibalise lean tissue to provide fuel. The easiest way to prevent this is to ensure that each muscle group is subjected to a load representing at least 70% of the 1 Rep Maximum (1RM) for a given exercise. This means that regardless of which exercise is chosen, at some point during a workout, at least one exercise should be performed with relatively heavy weights.
Manipulating, or more specifically escalating, density is one of the best ways of promoting fat-loss when programming.
Essentially, all that is required to escalate density is to complete a given amount of work in a progressively shorter and shorter time frame or complete a progressively greater amount of work in the same time frame.
A great example of this would be to perform the following:
The goal would be to complete 1-2 rounds of the circuit in as short a time as possible with a weight equal to the 5RM for the weakest of either the Power Clean of the Military/Push press. Rest 30-60 seconds and then repeat a further 2-4 times. On each subsequent workout, the goal would be to complete the same amount of work in a shorter overall time. It’s important not too focus too much on individual sets as a measure of progress, as the times for these can sometimes be misleading.
Possibly the easiest to monitor and evaluate, this is clearly evidenced by an increase in heart rate and respiration beyond comfortable.
Depending on the level of the individual this may be seen in a sudden drop in work rate or a sudden quickening of breath. The more trained an individual is, the more they are able to push themselves, whereas more sedentary people will get the same results at a much lower level of effort.
Whilst this is something you’ll rarely, if ever, be able to measure, it’s actually quite easy to produce.
The body will increase its production of growth hormone in response to elevated levels of lactic acid. Therefore, exercise selection, sequencing and programming should include a bias towards this where possible.
Ultimately there are two main ways to elevate lactic acid production:
Whilst the shift into anaerobic status is often simply achieved by adjusting the intensity or speed of the activity, it is not necessarily suitable for everyone, particularly beginners.
For this reason, biasing concentric contractions may be a more effective option.
There are two ways of increasing concentric muscle activity, exercise tempo and exercise selection.
In regards to tempo, the typical recommendation is to focus on slowing the eccentric portion of an exercise with a tempos such as 3010, whereas taking longer on the concentric with a tempo such as 1030 could actually be more effective for fat-loss.
In terms of exercise selection, some exercises have inherently higher levels of concentric activity. The following are all examples of exercises that bias the concentric portion of the relevant movement:
The main thing to remember when seeking to elevate lactic acid levels is that past a certain point, people will usually begin to experience e some degree of nausea. For this reason alone, it’s probably wise to remain just below the tolerance threshold.
So are any of these mutually exclusive? In short, no. The workout detailed above would achieve all of the five criteria detailed here for an optimal fat loss workout. That said, it’s not the only way of doing it. The following are three of the most common ways to modify programmes:
Whichever option you choose, make sure that it’s just enough of a change to stimulate progress and avoid pushing too hard unnecessarily.
Why Food and Training Still Matter for Clients with Obesity, Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes…
Walk into any gym on a weekday evening and you’ll hear it before you see…
The idea that yoga could strengthen the brain is no longer just a hunch from…
If you spend time with kettlebells in your programming, you know the swing can be…
Busy diaries don’t need to be a barrier to results. With a clear plan and…
Appetite control is one of those topics that’s talked about a lot in weight management…