Can You Lose Strength In One Week Blog Banner 2
It only takes a few missed sessions for clients to start worrying they’re losing their strength. A week off for a holiday, a busy patch at work or a short illness can feel harmless, but research shows that measurable declines in muscle function can appear surprisingly fast. For us as personal trainers, here we have a chance to guide clients through short breaks with confidence and structure.
The question isn’t just if people lose muscle in a week, but what actually changes and how quickly they can regain it. That’s exactly what the new 2025 study by Von Ruff and colleagues explored in middle-aged adults. The team used a detailed transcriptomic analysis, which means they looked at how genes in muscle tissue switch on and off, to track how fast strength and muscle biology shift during a short period of inactivity and rehabilitation.
We can use this type of insight to shape how we structure client programmes and manage expectations after time off. For anyone taking pt courses, understanding this physiological timeline helps turn a client’s frustration into a clear plan for recovery.
In the Von Ruff et al. (2025) study, eleven healthy adults aged around 57 had one leg immobilised for seven days using a sling. After just one week of non-use, the immobilised leg lost around 14% in one-rep max strength and 13% in isometric force. Muscle size barely changed, but the ability to generate force dropped sharply.
That loss wasn’t because the muscle disappeared. It was largely neuromuscular and metabolic. Electrical and biochemical communication between brain and muscle fibres became less efficient and the genes responsible for mitochondrial activity, that is the tiny power plants inside muscle cells, slowed down. The researchers found that pathways involved in cellular respiration and NADH dehydrogenase complex assembly were strongly downregulated, showing a rapid dip in energy metabolism.
At the same time, gene activity linked to inflammation and immune signalling increased, suggesting a low-grade inflammatory state during inactivity. Transcripts connected to complement activation and cytokine release rose noticeably. Together, these changes show that within seven days of disuse, muscle doesn’t just rest, it begins to reprogram itself towards lower energy output and greater inflammatory stress.
This pattern supports older research showing how fast muscle can change. Dirks et al. (2016) found that one week of bed rest led to a 1.4 kg loss of lean leg mass and reduced insulin sensitivity. Wall et al. (2016) reported that just five days of inactivity cut myofibrillar protein synthesis by 37% and blunted the anabolic response to nutrition. For clients who believe “a week off won’t matter,” these numbers tell another story.
Short breaks don’t undo years of work, but the body begins adjusting within days. That’s where structured re-entry matters and for anyone studying a personal trainer course, this understanding becomes essential for building effective recovery phases for clients.
Clients often describe their legs as feeling “flat” or “heavy” after time off, even if they don’t see visible changes. This sensation aligns with the rapid loss of neural drive and reduced mitochondrial gene activity found in the study.
Energy production drops, intracellular signalling slows and contraction efficiency declines. The muscle isn’t necessarily smaller, as DEXA scans in the Von Ruff study showed little change in lean mass, but its internal machinery isn’t firing properly. Strength loss appears before size loss because the nervous system and cellular energy pathways respond faster than structural tissue does.
Inflammatory markers like interleukin-18 (IL-18) and complement components C1Q and C3 also rose during inactivity. That inflammation adds to the feeling of sluggishness and stiffness, even in healthy individuals. For older or less active clients, these effects may compound more quickly.
In the Von Ruff study, when the immobilisation phase ended, participants were split into two groups: one performed lower-body resistance exercise three times per week for two weeks. The other did moderate treadmill walking.
The results were clear. Walking had minimal effect on the muscle transcriptome, with only a few dozen genes changing expression. Resistance exercise however, triggered hundreds of gene shifts in pathways linked to growth, metabolism and repair.
In the resistance group, genes related to muscle development, cytokine signalling and energy metabolism switched on strongly. Myostatin, a gene that limits muscle growth, was downregulated, while PPARGC1A, often called the “master regulator” of mitochondrial biogenesis, increased. Strength also improved measurably within two weeks.
These findings echo other studies showing that even short bursts of resistance work can re-activate the machinery for protein synthesis and mitochondrial recovery. Porter et al. (2015) found that 12 weeks of resistance training improved mitochondrial respiration and protein content in previously untrained adults, while Damas et al. (2018) showed that transcriptional changes supporting hypertrophy appear after the very first sessions of training.
Walking remains useful for circulation, joint movement and general conditioning, but when the goal is to regain strength fast, mechanical loading through resistance training is the clear winner.
The Von Ruff team took multiple biopsies over two weeks of rehabilitation to track molecular recovery. The timeline showed a dynamic sequence:
These phases align with what PTs see in practice. Clients feel sore and drained after the first workout, steadier by the second or third and stronger by week two. The transcriptomic data simply gives a molecular explanation for that pattern.
A structured re-entry plan during this phase helps the body move through those changes efficiently. Three non-consecutive strength sessions per week appear optimal for re-activating both neuromuscular and metabolic pathways. Sets of around 4 × 10 at ~70 % 1RM with controlled eccentric tempo work well for early adaptation. By the second week, small load increases or additional compound lifts like leg press or trap-bar deadlifts can re-establish power and coordination.
Clients should focus on movement quality and recovery rather than maximal effort. Excess fatigue only slows the transcriptional rebound that drives adaptation.
Nutritional support during this two-week comeback is critical. Even short periods of inactivity can reduce muscle protein synthesis, so hitting 1.6–2.2 g of protein per kg of body weight per day helps restore balance. Distributing intake evenly across meals (~0.4 g/kg per meal) supports continuous amino acid availability.
Creatine (3–5 g per day) assists in maintaining training quality, while carbohydrates before sessions restore energy availability for the newly re-engaged mitochondria. Adequate hydration and consistent sleep patterns help manage inflammation and fatigue.
Older clients or those returning from illness benefit from slightly higher protein intakes and more gradual loading. Trainers who complete advanced fitness courses in nutrition or exercise programming can use this knowledge to create precise return-to-train plans that protect against further losses.
We can educate clients on the fact that strength begins to fade within a week of inactivity, but the body can bounce back quickly with the right plan. The key lies in progressive resistance exercise which is happens as soon as possible after returning from a break, is structured and consistent.
Within two weeks, mitochondrial genes reignite, protein synthesis rises, inflammation resolves and strength begins to return. Walking or light cardio won’t achieve that alone.
For personal trainers, this reinforces why even short training breaks deserve careful planning. Knowing how fast detraining occurs and how the muscle genome responds gives every coach a framework to guide clients safely and effectively back to form.
Ready to coach with proof, not guesswork? Our Gym Instructor & Personal Trainer Practitioner, Specialist & Master Diplomas give you the practical systems to build strength fast and keep it there. A 2025 study on middle-aged adults showed that just 7 days of disuse cut knee-extension 1RM by ~14% and isometric force by ~13%, while walking had minimal effect on the muscle transcriptome. In contrast, resistance training three times a week for two weeks switched on hundreds of muscle-relevant genes and improved strength. On the Practitioner route you’ll lock in coaching fundamentals that stop clients drifting into that one-week slump. Step into the Specialist route to plan smarter returns to training with progressions that reactivate neural drive and mitochondrial function quickly. Go Master when you want to design evidence-led programmes that handle real-world breaks, rebuild strength with intent and prove it with simple testing your clients can feel and see. If you want qualifications that turn science into sessions clients rave about, this is where you start.
Gym Instructor & Personal Trainer Practitioner Diploma™ – Distance Study, In-Person & Live-Virtual
Gym Instructor & Personal Trainer Specialist Diploma™ – Distance Study, In-Person & Live-Virtual
Gym Instructor & Personal Trainer Master Diploma™ – Distance Study, In-Person & Live-Virtual
Health is often mistaken for fitness. The problem is that plenty of people can run…
Can Prediabetes be Reversed Through Exercise? Prediabetes has become one of the biggest health challenges…
Does Cluster Resistance Training Work? Cluster resistance training has become a bit of a buzz…
Why Menopause Training Needs a Smarter Approach Training in midlife often feels different. Recovery seems…
We often talk about training the body, but what about the mind that drives it?…
Learning efficiently and effectively is something you can train your brain to do. The right…